How Mi Casino is assessed in this guide: methodology and affiliate disclosure
This page explains the methodology used to review Mi Casino across the site’s pages: which sources are used and in what order, how data that doesn’t match is presented, which 9 criteria the brand is assessed on, and what commercial relationship exists with the operator, including the code CL1000. Review data was checked in November 2026.
In this article
Who publishes this guide and how it is funded
This site is an informational affiliate guide to MiCasino, not the operator. When someone signs up through its links or with the code CL1000, the site may receive a commission; the terms of play and of each promotion are always those published by micasino.com.
Short answer: Every piece of data is taken from verifiable documents, with priority given to the regulator’s register and the operator’s documents; public industry guides are used as a complement and cited by name. When two sources don’t match, both versions are shown. Instead of scores or stars, each criterion gets a status: Confirmed, Partially confirmed, Not confirmed or Depends on the account. This site does not publish its own real-money tests or user ratings.
This is an affiliate site dedicated to a single brand: Mi Casino, for players in Chile. It is funded by commissions from the operator’s affiliate programme.
The site does not take deposits, has no access to player accounts and cannot change bonuses, limits or withdrawals. All of that happens on micasino.com, under the operator’s terms. More context about the site is in about us.
Affiliate disclosure: what the commission means
If you sign up through a link on this site or use the code CL1000, the operator may pay the site a commission. The code CL1000 is associated with this guide: it is entered in the code field of the sign-up form, before tapping “Confirm”, and cannot be added later.
| What the site receives | What doesn’t change for you |
|---|---|
| A commission when a registration comes through its links or with CL1000 | The terms of the bonus you activate: they are those published in the operator’s promotion |
| The attribution of the registration to this guide | The wagering requirement, time limit and maximum bet of each bonus |
| No access to your account or your payment details | The verification (KYC) rules, payment methods and withdrawal times |
The code CL1000 gives nothing extra on top of the published welcome offer. That is why the pages present it as what it is, an affiliate code, and refer to the Mi Casino bonus guide for the actual terms.
A commission is an incentive, and the way to counter it is transparency: the criteria are published on this page, and the data is cross-checked against documents any reader can review.
Sources and hierarchy of trust
Not all sources carry the same weight. When a piece of data appears in several, the highest-level one prevails.
| Source type | Example | What it is used for | Trust level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulator | Curaçao Gaming Authority certificate (cert.gcb.cw) | Licence, number, date and status | High |
| Operator documents | Privacy policy, country landing page, legal footer of the MiCasino blog | Contacts, complaint time frames, operator details | High or medium, depending on how old the document is |
| Public industry guides | AlAireLibre, Futdados, PrensaFutbol | Bonuses, cashier, registration, games, support | Medium; confirming in the cashier or chat is recommended |
| Aggregators | CB Insights | Sports betting provider (Altenar) | Method |
| Law and news | Law 19.995; Upcomer on the bill | Legal context in Chile | High for the law; medium for the status of the bill |
Each page names the source within the sentence (“according to the operator’s privacy policy”, “public guides describe…”) and ends with a table of sources and the date they were read. In addition, each piece of data carries one of three statuses: published by the operator, our own calculation based on the published terms (with the formula shown) or the editorial team’s assessment.
How conflicts between sources are handled
When two sources don’t match, one is not chosen silently: both versions are shown, along with where to confirm.
| Data point | Versions found | How it is presented |
|---|---|---|
| Casino bonus maximum | US$375 in the current terms; US$370 in older reviews | US$375 is used and the earlier figure is mentioned |
| Webpay | One guide says it isn’t there; a weak source says it is | Not confirmed; checking the cashier is recommended |
| No-deposit bonus | Two sources say it doesn’t exist; another describes a bonus for verifying your account with a ×1 requirement | Open conflict; how to check it in your account is explained |
| Licence | CGA certificate OGL/2024/1580/0801; the blog footer and some guides cite the old 365/JAZ | The regulator’s register prevails; the old one is explained as legacy data |
| Launch year | 2022 in some sources, 2023 in others | Both are cited |
This rule also avoids rounding: if a figure comes from a single review, that is stated. The conflicts that matter most to players, such as the licence, are analysed in Is Mi Casino trustworthy?.
Assessment criteria: a 9-point checklist
The same 9 criteria are applied in the main review and on the topic pages. Each one has a definition of what counts as confirmed.
| Criterion | What is reviewed | What counts as confirmed |
|---|---|---|
| Licence | Regulator, number, date, status, domain | An active entry on the regulator’s site for micasino.com |
| Registration and KYC | Fields, documents, when verification happens | Description in recently dated guides; an unpublished verification time frame is flagged |
| Bonuses | Percentage, maximum, wagering requirement, time limit, maximum bet, eligible games | Terms with a recent verification date |
| Payments | Deposit and withdrawal methods, time frames, minimums, fees | Method and time frame published; unpublished limits and fees are flagged |
| Games | Lobby sections, examples with RTP, providers | Section described by sources; RTP only as cited data, verifiable in the game |
| Mobile access | Native app, mobile site, APK | Sources agreeing on what exists and what doesn’t |
| Support | Channels, language, hours, response times | Channels in operator documents; times according to guides |
| Responsible gambling | Self-exclusion, limits, help resources | Tools described in the account panel |
| Transparency of limits | Published withdrawal, table and betting limits | Figures published by the operator or in the bonus terms |
Why statuses and not scores
A score like “8.5 out of 10” mixes verifiable data with opinions and hides what is missing. A status per criterion says exactly what is known.
| Status | Meaning | Example at Mi Casino |
|---|---|---|
| Confirmed | Data in a high-level source or in several matching ones | CGA licence, active status |
| Partially confirmed | One part published and another not | Withdrawals: methods and bank transfer time frame published; crypto time frame not |
| Not confirmed | No source, or conflicting sources not resolved | Webpay in the cashier; two-factor authentication |
| Depends on the account | Varies by user or their level | Birthday bonus according to VIP level |
With this format, a limitation is not offset by an advantage: if withdrawal limits are not published, the criterion is flagged as such even if the bonuses are clear.
What this site does not do
- It does not publish its own real-money tests or screenshots of an account; when a piece of data depends on the account, it says so.
- It does not publish user ratings, stars or reviews attributed to players.
- It does not reproduce data from Trustpilot or other review platforms as if it were its own.
- It does not promise gambling results or present gambling as a source of income.
- It does not attribute to Mi Casino any providers, limits or features that the sources don’t describe.
Updates and review date
The data on the site corresponds to November 2026. What changes most, and is checked first in each update, are the bonus terms, the cashier methods, the licence registration and the status of the online betting bill, which as of October 2026 was still in the Senate. When a piece of data changes, it is replaced on every page so that it has a single value across the site.
How to report an error
If you find outdated data or a different condition on micasino.com, write to the editorial team through the channels on the contact page. State the page, the data and, if possible, where you saw the new version. The site does not handle complaints about accounts or payments: those go to the operator’s support.
Frequently asked questions
Does the commission change the bonus terms?
No. The bonus terms are those published in the operator’s promotion, whether or not you use the code CL1000.
Why is there no final star rating?
Because several key pieces of data are not published. A status per criterion shows what is confirmed and what is missing; a single score hides it.
Do the pages include tests with a real account?
No. This site does not publish its own real-money tests; it works with operator documents, the regulator’s register and public guides cited by name.
How often is the data reviewed?
The review date appears on each page; the current version corresponds to November 2026. The operator’s terms may change between reviews, which is why confirming them on micasino.com before depositing is recommended.
For the risks of gambling and limit-setting tools, see the responsible gambling guide.